* docs(arch): consolidate ARCHITECTURE + PLATFORM-TECH-STACK + NAMING + EPICS-1-6 + BOOTSTRAP-KIT-EXPANSION → docs/ARCHITECTURE.md (lean doc strategy) Single canonical "how OpenOva works" doc per founder's lean-doc strategy. 2926 source lines → 1110 consolidated lines, no semantic loss. Sections: §1 High-level model (Catalyst/Sovereign/Org/Env/Application/Blueprint) §2 Repo layout §3 Tech stack by layer (CNI/GitOps/IaC/event-spine/data/secrets/identity/...) §4 Naming conventions (dimensions, patterns, labels, DOMAINS-CANON) §5 Catalyst control plane (rules, CRDs, controllers, cutover, identity, surfaces) §6 Per-host-cluster infrastructure §7 Application Blueprints §8 Multi-region topology (1 cpx52/region, WireGuard-over-public-IPs, ClusterMesh) §9 Bootstrap-kit slot ordering (full 48-slot canonical list) §10 EPIC-level design overview (EPIC-0 through EPIC-6) §11 Per-chart DESIGN.md inventory §12 OAM influence §13 Read further Stale literal fixes: - omantel.openova.io → omantel.biz / <sovereign>.<tld> / t38.omani.works (7 instances) - SPIRE marked DEFERRED / opt-in only (PR #665, TBD-V29 #2055) - failover-controller marked REPLACED by bp-continuum New PR refs wired into §3: - PR #665 SPIRE deferral - PR #2071 bp-cnpg-pair synchronous remote_apply (zero-tx-loss multi-region) - PR #2087 bp-cnpg-pair pre-merge guard - PR #2093 bp-cnpg-pair pre-merge guard New stack components added to §3: - bp-cnpg-pair (synchronous remote_apply ReplicaCluster across ClusterMesh) - bp-continuum (lease-based failover orchestrator) - bp-self-sovereign-cutover (8-tether pivot, ADR-0002, Principle #11) Source docs (to be deleted by orchestrator in final PR): - docs/PLATFORM-TECH-STACK.md - docs/NAMING-CONVENTION.md - docs/EPICS-1-6-unified-design.md - docs/BOOTSTRAP-KIT-EXPANSION-PLAN.md * docs(principles): consolidate INVIOLABLE-PRINCIPLES + ANTI-PATTERN-CATALOG → docs/PRINCIPLES.md (lean doc strategy) * docs(dod): consolidate 5-PILLAR-DOD + DOMAINS-CANON + SOVEREIGN-MULTI-REGION-DOD + PERSONAS-AND-JOURNEYS → docs/DOD.md (lean doc strategy) * docs(runbooks+status+glossary): consolidate 5 runbooks → RUNBOOKS.md + refresh STATUS.md + fold banned-terms into GLOSSARY.md (lean doc strategy) Part 1 — Runbook consolidation: - NEW docs/RUNBOOKS.md with 7 numbered sections (provisioning, day-2 ops, Blueprint authoring, chart conventions, demo walk, failover, troubleshooting) - Folds BLUEPRINT-AUTHORING / CHART-AUTHORING / DEMO-RUNBOOK / RUNBOOK-OPERATIONS / RUNBOOK-PROVISIONING into one canonical surface - Documents dual-annotation requirement for charts with enabled.default: false (GUARD 1 #2087 no-upstream + GUARD 2 #2093 smoke-render) with bp-network-policies:1.0.1 dead-reserve incident as the live evidence - All admin.<fqdn> legacy URL refs → console.<fqdn>/bss (BSS lives in operator console) - All openova.io / omantel.omani.works test commands → canonical t<NN>.omani.works - Cites PRs #2076 (docs migration), #2082 (no-auto-close-keyword), #2087, #2093 Part 2 — STATUS.md refresh (renamed from IMPLEMENTATION-STATUS.md): - Header dated 2026-05-20 (was 2026-04-29; 22 days stale per audit) - Adds 🟦 CODE-COMPLETE state for "controllers + CRDs + tests landed, awaiting fresh-prov walk" (per 5-pillar DoD) - Pillar 3 marked CODE-COMPLETE (PRs #2071/#2072/#2073/#2074/#2075/#2053) - Adds 3 new CRDs verified in products/catalyst/chart/crds/: CNPGPair, PDM, Sandbox - Sandbox controller chain CODE-COMPLETE (PRs #1615/#1618/#1621/#1622/#1626/#1631/#1632) - SPIRE marked DEFERRED — opt-in only (PRs #665, #2056, #2061) - New §6 CI / supply-chain guards table: hollow-chart (#2087), smoke-render (#2093), no-auto-close-keyword (#2082), observability-toggle, subchart 4-step, Flux version-pin replay - New §9 Pillar-status table — Pillars 1/2/3/4 CODE-COMPLETE, Pillar 5 🚧 - Pillar 1 (PRs #2038 V18, #2043 V18-D), Pillar 2 (PR #2029 V20), Pillar 3 (per above), Pillar 4 (Sandbox chain) Part 3 — GLOSSARY.md folded as single source of truth for banned terms: - Header dated 2026-05-20, notes "single source of truth for banned terms" and "no separate BANNED-TERMS.md" - Existing 11 banned-terms rows rewritten with italicized qualifiers - NEW Forbidden test domains subsection: openova.io (mothership-only), omantel.openova.io (hallucinated), Nova Cloud (predecessor brand), eventforge.io (hallucinated), admin.<fqdn> (dead BSS URL) - SPIFFE/SPIRE identity row + acronym row marked deferred per PR #665 with TBD-V29 (#2055) re-introduction roadmap - Cross-links updated: IMPLEMENTATION-STATUS → STATUS, SOVEREIGN-PROVISIONING + BLUEPRINT-AUTHORING → RUNBOOKS.md CLAUDE.md NOT touched. Source files NOT deleted (orchestrator owns deletion). No push, no PR. Manifest at /tmp/merge-D-runbooks-status-glossary-manifest.txt. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: assemble lean doc strategy — delete legacy sources, move ledger/sessions/archive, ADR-0004, rewrite cross-refs Per founder direction 2026-05-20 + user-global ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md §11. This is the orchestrator commit on top of the four cherry-picked consolidation commits (ARCHITECTURE, PRINCIPLES, DOD, RUNBOOKS+STATUS+GLOSSARY). It: 1. Deletes 15 legacy source docs (now folded into the 7 canonical): PLATFORM-TECH-STACK, NAMING-CONVENTION, EPICS-1-6-unified-design, BOOTSTRAP-KIT-EXPANSION-PLAN, INVIOLABLE-PRINCIPLES, ANTI-PATTERN-CATALOG, 5-PILLAR-DOD, DOMAINS-CANON, SOVEREIGN-MULTI-REGION-DOD, PERSONAS-AND-JOURNEYS, BLUEPRINT-AUTHORING, CHART-AUTHORING, DEMO-RUNBOOK, RUNBOOK-OPERATIONS, RUNBOOK-PROVISIONING. 2. Moves transient + historical docs into proper subdirs: - docs/ledger/{TRUST,TRACKER}.md (cron-refreshed live state) - docs/sessions/{2026-05-17-convergence,2026-05-19-20-trust-recovery, 2026-05-20-trust-audit,2026-05-20-walk-runbook}.md - docs/archive/{validation-log,orchestrator-state,omantel-handover-wbs}.md 3. Adds docs/adr/0004-cnpg-sync-replication.md (Pillar 3 zero-tx-loss decision) + docs/adr/README.md index. 4. Updates CLAUDE.md reading-order + repo-structure block to match the lean strategy and current core/ tree (controllers/, marketplace/, etc.). 5. Sweeps all .md files + .github/workflows + scripts to repoint old doc paths to the new canonical homes. ADR cross-references kept intact (ADRs are immutable historical artifacts). Operator-side cron scripts that still write to the old paths (/home/openova/bin/refresh-dod-dashboard.sh, refresh-wbs.sh and openova-private/bin/trust-audit.sh) need a one-line path update — flagged in the PR body. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(bootstrap-kit): update repo-root sentinel to docs/PRINCIPLES.md The bootstrap-kit Go test used `docs/INVIOLABLE-PRINCIPLES.md` as its repo-root sentinel; the file no longer exists after the lean-doc consolidation (it's now `docs/PRINCIPLES.md`). Update the walker to match the new canonical filename. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: hatiyildiz <269457768+hatiyildiz@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
7.4 KiB
Harbor
Container registry with vulnerability scanning. Per-host-cluster infrastructure (see docs/ARCHITECTURE.md §3.5) — every host cluster runs a Harbor instance for Catalyst component images, mirrored Blueprint OCI artifacts, and customer images.
Status: Accepted | Updated: 2026-04-27
Overview
Harbor is mandatory on every host cluster. Each host cluster runs its own Harbor instance that mirrors from upstream sources (ghcr.io/openova-io/... for Catalyst components and Blueprint OCI artifacts; the customer's own CI for application images). Local Harbor = fast Pod pulls, no cross-region traffic on every image pull, air-gap ready.
flowchart TB
subgraph Upstream["Upstream OCI sources"]
GHCR[ghcr.io/openova-io/* — Catalyst + Blueprints]
CustCI[Customer CI — Application images]
end
subgraph Cluster1["Host cluster A (e.g. hz-fsn-rtz-prod)"]
H1[Harbor — local mirror]
T1[Trivy Scanner]
Pods1[Pods pull locally]
end
subgraph Cluster2["Host cluster B (e.g. hz-hel-rtz-prod)"]
H2[Harbor — local mirror]
T2[Trivy Scanner]
Pods2[Pods pull locally]
end
GHCR -.->|"pull mirror"| H1
CustCI -.->|"push"| H1
GHCR -.->|"pull mirror"| H2
CustCI -.->|"push"| H2
H1 --> T1
H2 --> T2
H1 --> Pods1
H2 --> Pods2
Why Mandatory?
| Requirement | Harbor (per host cluster) | External Registry |
|---|---|---|
| Local pulls (no cross-region traffic) | ✅ Each cluster's Pods pull from local Harbor | ❌ Pods pull cross-region |
| Vulnerability scanning | ✅ Trivy integrated | ⚠️ Depends on provider |
| Air-gap support | ✅ Self-hosted | ❌ |
| RBAC | ✅ Full control | ⚠️ Provider-specific |
| Audit logging | ✅ Complete | ⚠️ Limited |
| No external dependency at runtime | ✅ Once mirrored | ❌ |
Features
| Feature | Support |
|---|---|
| Image storage | OCI-compliant |
| Vulnerability scanning | Trivy integration |
| Image signing | Cosign/Notary |
| Replication | Push/pull between regions |
| RBAC | Project-based access |
| Quotas | Per-project storage limits |
| Garbage collection | Automatic cleanup |
Per-host-cluster mirroring (NOT primary-replica)
Catalyst's agreed model is one Harbor per host cluster, each independently pulling from upstream OCI sources. There is no Harbor-to-Harbor replication primary/replica.
sequenceDiagram
participant CI as CI / Upstream OCI
participant H1 as Harbor (cluster A)
participant T1 as Trivy (cluster A)
participant H2 as Harbor (cluster B)
participant T2 as Trivy (cluster B)
participant Pods as Pods
CI->>H1: pull-mirror sync (configured per project)
H1->>T1: scan on ingest
CI->>H2: pull-mirror sync (independent of H1)
H2->>T2: scan on ingest
Pods->>H1: pull (cluster A Pods)
Pods->>H2: pull (cluster B Pods)
Why pull-mirror, not Harbor-to-Harbor replication:
- Single source of truth = upstream (
ghcr.io/openova-io/...or customer CI), not a "primary Harbor". - Each cluster is its own failure domain — primary-replica drift between Harbors would be one more thing to fail.
- Air-gap path is the same shape: a one-time mirror import vs ongoing primary-pushed replication.
Benefits:
- Images available locally in each cluster.
- Survives any cluster (including the management cluster) going down — workload clusters keep pulling locally.
- Faster pulls (no cross-region traffic per Pod start).
Storage Backend Options
| Backend | Use Case | Notes |
|---|---|---|
PVC (type: filesystem) |
Dev / contabo / single-node | Default render — no S3 wiring |
| Cloud-native S3 | Production Sovereigns | Hetzner Object Storage / AWS S3 / GCP / Azure |
Recommended: Cloud-native S3 (per ADR-0001 §13)
S3-aware apps (Harbor is one) write DIRECTLY to the cloud-provider's native S3 endpoint. SeaweedFS is reserved as a POSIX→S3 buffer for legacy POSIX-only writers and is NOT in the minimal Sovereign set.
flowchart LR
Harbor[Harbor] -->|"S3 API (HTTPS)"| Hetzner[Hetzner Object Storage<br/>fsn1.your-objectstorage.com]
Configuration
Helm Values (per-Sovereign overlay shape — issue #383 / #425)
gateway:
host: registry.<sovereign-fqdn>
# Vendor-agnostic Object Storage seam — populated via Flux valuesFrom
# against the canonical flux-system/object-storage Sealed Secret.
objectStorage:
enabled: true
credentialsSecretName: harbor-objectstorage-credentials
s3:
accessKey: "" # populated by Flux valuesFrom
secretKey: "" # populated by Flux valuesFrom
harbor:
persistence:
imageChartStorage:
type: s3
s3:
# bucket / region / regionendpoint also populated by Flux valuesFrom
existingSecret: harbor-objectstorage-credentials
v4auth: true
secure: true
trivy:
enabled: true
database:
type: internal # or external for CNPG
redis:
type: internal # or external for Valkey
core:
secretName: harbor-core-secret
Pull-mirror policy
{
"name": "ghcr-openova-mirror",
"src_registry": {
"type": "harbor",
"url": "https://ghcr.io",
"credential": {
"access_key": "",
"access_secret": ""
}
},
"trigger": {
"type": "scheduled",
"trigger_settings": {
"cron": "0 */6 * * *"
}
},
"filters": [
{
"type": "name",
"value": "openova-io/**"
}
],
"enabled": true
}
Security Scanning
Trivy Integration
| Scan Type | Trigger |
|---|---|
| On push | Automatic when image pushed |
| Scheduled | Daily full scan |
| Manual | On-demand via UI/API |
Scan Policy
| Severity | Action |
|---|---|
| Critical | Block pull |
| High | Allow (configurable) |
| Medium | Allow |
| Low | Allow |
Kyverno Policies
Require Harbor Images
apiVersion: kyverno.io/v1
kind: ClusterPolicy
metadata:
name: require-harbor-images
spec:
validationFailureAction: Enforce
rules:
- name: require-harbor-registry
match:
any:
- resources:
kinds:
- Pod
validate:
message: "Images must be pulled from Harbor registry"
pattern:
spec:
containers:
- image: "harbor.<location-code>.<sovereign-domain>/*"
Resource Requirements
| Component | CPU | Memory |
|---|---|---|
| Harbor Core | 0.5 | 512Mi |
| Registry | 0.5 | 512Mi |
| Database | 0.5 | 512Mi |
| Redis | 0.25 | 256Mi |
| Trivy | 0.5 | 1Gi |
| Total | 2.25 | 2.75Gi |
Backup Strategy
Harbor data backed up via Velero to Archival S3:
flowchart LR
Harbor[Harbor] --> Velero[Velero]
Velero --> S3[Archival S3]
Backed up:
- Database (PostgreSQL)
- Registry storage (blobs)
- Configuration
Consequences
Positive:
- Complete control over image lifecycle.
- Built-in vulnerability scanning (Trivy on ingest).
- Per-cluster mirror = no cross-region pull traffic; each cluster is an independent failure domain.
- Air-gap ready (one-time import works the same way as ongoing pull-mirror).
- Audit trail for compliance.
Negative:
- Resource overhead (~3GB RAM)
- Operational responsibility
- Backup requirements (handled by Velero)
Part of OpenOva